Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III ZP 2/99 AI generated

Supreme Court rules that dismissal from a press spokesperson role does not immediately terminate the supplementary salary allowance.

Case Number III ZP 2/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether a prosecutor's supplementary salary for a press spokesperson role ended upon immediate dismissal from that function. The lower courts found the prosecutor was dismissed without a notice period and denied the salary, but the Supreme Court clarified that such a role is often distinct from the main employment contract. Consequently, the court held that the salary continues to be due until the end of the notice period applicable to the specific supplementary allowance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 5 ust. 1 rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów z dnia 14 marca 1994 r. w sprawie wynagrodzeń prokuratorów oraz asesorów i aplikantów prokuratury; The supplementary salary for a press spokesperson role is payable during the tenure of the function and terminates only upon the expiration of the applicable notice period, not immediately upon dismissal from the function.

Keywords

AI generated
prosecutor supplementary salary press spokesperson function dismissal notice period public servant employment termination of allowance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 5 ust. 1 rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów z dnia 14 marca 1994 r. w sprawie wynagrodzeń prokuratorów oraz asesorów i aplikantów prokuratury
art. 390 KPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text