Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling contract classification depends on parties' intent and substance, not just the label.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee against a labor inspector's determination of an employment relationship. The court found that the lower labor court correctly prioritized the parties' actual intent and the substantive content of the contract over the literal label of 'service agreement.' The decision established that while a contract's name is not decisive, the court must examine whether the agreement's terms and practical execution reveal a genuine intent to create an employment relationship rather than a service one.