Teacher dismissed from lawsuit after settlement regarding pension eligibility and prior resignation intent.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the teacher's cassation appeal against a settlement agreement that terminated her employment. The teacher had previously signaled an intent to resign and retire, thereby forfeiting her right to challenge the initial decision placing her in a non-active status. The court ruled that the settlement, which extended her employment beyond the statutory period, was voluntary and did not violate her interests since she had ample time to verify her pension eligibility.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 469 KPC; Art. 393 § 1 KPC: A party who has entered into a settlement agreement accepting a transfer to a non-active status cannot appeal against its legal consequences solely because a subsequent pension review reveals they do not meet all requirements for retirement rights.