Supreme Court allows collective agreement clause interpretation using all rules, not just linguistic ones.

The Supreme Court partially allowed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a lower court's dismissal of a claim for a higher severance payment. The lower court had interpreted a collective agreement clause using only linguistic methods, rejecting an argument based on the intent of the drafters. The Supreme Court ruled that such clauses must be interpreted using all legal rules, including logical and teleological methods, to ensure consistency with the law on work accidents and occupational diseases.