Supreme Court dismissed appeal, holding that labor law protective intent does not override clear contract terms.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal regarding a dispute over unpaid wages and salary reductions. The plaintiff argued that the employer's intent to protect employee interests under the Labor Code should override the explicit written terms of the employment contract. The court rejected this, ruling that the protective purpose of the law cannot negate clear contractual language or ignore the parties' expressed intent at the time of signing.