III SZ 3/98
AI generated
Supreme Court quashes disciplinary ruling for failure to cite specific violated law and lack of hearing.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court quashed the disciplinary court's ruling against a lawyer for non-payment of membership fees. The lower court failed to specify the exact legal provision violated and did not hear the accused, while also citing contradictory ethical grounds. Consequently, the case was remanded for a new trial with corrected procedural and substantive errors.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 64 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy o radcach prawnych; Art. 32 pkt 5 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości: A disciplinary decision must explicitly identify the specific violated legal provision and ensure the accused is heard; failure to do so requires quashing the ruling.
Keywords
AI generated
disciplinary proceedings
specific legal provision
right to hearing
remand for retrial
procedural defect
lawyer ethics
statutory citation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 64 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 6 lipca 1982 r. o radcach prawnych
Art. 32 pkt 5 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 6 kwietnia 1984 r.
Art. 65 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 6 lipca 1982 r. o radcach prawnych
Art. 70 ust. 1 ustawy o radcach prawnych
Art. 437 § 1 KPK