Supreme Court dismissed cassation as inadmissible due to the disputed amount falling below the statutory threshold.

The Supreme Court declared the cassation inadmissible because the disputed monetary value was below the statutory minimum required for review. The applicant sought compensatory certificates for lost salary increases from working under special conditions, which the Social Insurance Institution initially denied but a lower court had granted. The Court determined that the calculated value of the certificates, based on the applicant's age and pension base, did not meet the financial threshold set by Article 393 of the Code of Civil Procedure.