I PKN 519/98
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal as claims were time-barred and appeal lacked substantive grounds.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Urszula Ł. against the Agricultural Property Agency regarding her termination of employment. The court found that all claims were time-barred under the Labor Code, rendering a substantive review of the employer's conduct unnecessary. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because it merely restated the plaintiff's demands without challenging the established facts or legal application regarding the statute of limitations.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 264 § 1, Art. 291 § 1, Art. 293, Art. 3931 § 1, Art. 3931 § 2 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 233 § 1 KPC: When claims are time-barred, a cassation appeal that does not challenge the limitation finding lacks substantive grounds and must be dismissed.
Keywords
AI generated
Labor Code
Statute of Limitations
Cassation Appeal
Dismissal of Appeal
Employment Termination
Time-Barred Claims
Labor Dispute
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 264 § 1 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 291 § 1 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 293 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 233 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 3931 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 3931 § 2 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego