Supreme Court dismisses appeal when party appeals social security decision with significant delay, making court duty to inform moot.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a social security claimant against a pension supplement decision. The claimant appealed the administrative body's refusal after significantly exceeding the statutory deadline for filing an objection. The court ruled that because the appeal was untimely, the court had no obligation to inform the party about the possibility of appointing an ex officio lawyer, rendering the procedural violation claim baseless.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 5 KPC; Art. 4779 § 1 KPC; Art. 3933 KPC; When a party appeals an administrative decision with significant delay, the court is not obligated to inform them of the possibility of appointing an ex officio lawyer, and any claim of procedural violation based on this omission is inadmissible.