Supreme Court dismisses pensioner's appeal, ruling res judicata applies to sentence substance, not flawed wording.

The Supreme Court dismissed the pensioner's cassation appeal against the appellate court's rejection of her pension revaluation claim. The applicant argued that a prior administrative decision regarding her work period should have been considered, but the court held that the principle of res judicata applies to the substantive essence of a judgment rather than its incorrectly formulated sentence. Consequently, the court determined that the lower courts correctly established the work period based on available evidence, making any re-examination of that period inadmissible in the revaluation proceedings.