III RN 92/98 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed extraordinary review for lack of legal basis regarding administrative inaction under Art. 155 KPA.

Case Number III RN 92/98

Court / Authority Sąd Najwyższy

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 1998-12-02

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland dismissed the extraordinary review against the Chief Geodetic Officer's decision. The applicant argued that the competent authority failed to act under Article 155 of the Civil Procedure Act, yet the court found no legal ground for such a claim. The court ruled that the applicant's letters constituted a request for retrial rather than a request for review under Article 155, and that the original decision could not be verified against the notarial deed without violating the law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 57 ust. 2 ustawy o Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym; Art. 155 KPA: There is no legal basis for alleging a gross violation of law or public interest solely because the competent administrative organ did not decide pursuant to Article 155 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Keywords

AI generated

extraordinary review administrative inaction Civil Procedure Act gross violation of law retrial procedure property registration notarial deed

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 57 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 11 maja 1995 r. o Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym

art. 155 KPA

art. 235 § 1 KPA

art. 149 § 2 i § 3 KPA

art. 236 ust. 2 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej

art. 393 12 KPC

art. 63 Konstytucji

art. 236 ust. 2 Konstytucji

Supreme Court dismissed extraordinary review for lack of legal basis regarding administrative inaction under Art. 155 KPA.

Legislator summary

Legislator headnote

Keywords

Cited Legislation

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Full text