Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III RN 90/98 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses extraordinary review based on doctrine violation, allowing it for contradictory administrative decisions.

Case Number III RN 90/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland granted an extraordinary review against a lower administrative court's refusal of flood relief funds. The applicant argued the lower court violated legal principles by narrowly interpreting flood damage and failing to explain facts, while the opposing party contended that mere doctrinal disagreements do not justify overturning a final judgment. The court ruled that while the review was dismissed regarding the doctrine violation claim, it was allowed because the lower court's decision contradicted a separate award of assistance, creating a legal inconsistency that warranted re-examination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 1 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 17 lipca 1997 r. o stosowaniu szczególnych rozwiązań w związku z likwidacją skutków powodzi; Art. 7 i 8 KPA: An extraordinary review is not based on doctrinal disputes but is permitted when a final judgment contradicts another decision regarding the same facts, violating the principle of deepening citizen trust.

Keywords

AI generated
extraordinary review flood relief funds contradictory decisions principle of trust administrative law legal inconsistency statutory interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 1 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 17 lipca 1997 r. o stosowaniu szczególnych rozwiązań w związku z likwidacją skutków powodzi
Art. 7 i 8 KPA
Art. 393 13 KPC
Art. 10 ustawy z dnia 1 marca 1996 r. o zmianie Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text