Concurrent employment does not bar unemployment allowance for dismissed public employee.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court ruling that denied unemployment compensation to a dismissed public employee. The employee had been simultaneously employed by another entity when her contract with the municipal office ended, yet the court found this did not constitute 'unemployment' under the law. The court ruled that the statutory requirement for unemployment allowance is based on the loss of a specific job, not the existence of other concurrent employment.