Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 329/98 AI generated

Running a business during unpaid leave triggers social security contributions for self-employed individuals under Polish law.

Case Number II UKN 329/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Wiesława Z.-N. against the Social Insurance Fund regarding her social security status. The court confirmed that conducting a dental practice while on unpaid leave under Article 174 of the Labor Code subjects her to social insurance as a self-employed person, not as an employee. The ruling clarified that unpaid leave does not constitute employment sufficient to exempt her from self-employed contributions, distinguishing it from paid leave or maternity leave where remuneration is received.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 18 grudnia 1976 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym osób prowadzących działalność gospodarczą; Art. 174 Kodeksu pracy: Conducting business activities during unpaid leave precludes the employee exemption from social security contributions for self-employed persons because the lack of remuneration means the employee is not employed at least half-time.

Keywords

AI generated
unpaid leave social security contributions self-employed status dental practice employee exemption Labor Code double insurance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 174 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 18 grudnia 1976 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym osób prowadzących działalność gospodarczą
Art. 22 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 18 grudnia 1976 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym osób prowadzących działalność gospodarczą
Art. 393 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text