Supreme Court dismisses appeal for reinstatement due to failure to cite Art. 45 § 1 KP on dismissal validity.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal seeking reinstatement to employment. The appellant argued that the dismissal was unjustified and violated procedural rules regarding witness testimony and dismissal grounds. The court ruled that because the appeal did not specifically challenge the validity of the dismissal under Article 45 § 1 of the Labor Code, the Supreme Court could not review the substantive justification of the termination.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 39311 KPC; Art. 39312 KPC; Art. 30 KP; Art. 45 § 1 KP: The Supreme Court reviews cassation appeals only within the scope of cited grounds; failure to allege violation of the requirement to justify dismissal under Art. 45 § 1 KP precludes examination of the dismissal's substantive validity.