Supreme Court dismisses appeal; placing a teacher in inactive status is a status change, not termination, requiring no notice.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a lower court ruling that upheld a teacher's transfer to inactive status. The plaintiff argued this action constituted a termination requiring notice under Article 20 of the Teachers' Card, but the court found the transfer to be a distinct status change rather than a dissolution of the employment relationship. Consequently, the court ruled that no notice is required for such a transfer, which only expires after six months, thereby validating the school's decision.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 20 ust. 1 Karty Nauczyciela; Art. 20 ust. 3 Karty Nauczyciela; The transfer of a teacher to inactive status is a change of employment status and does not constitute a termination of the employment relationship, thus Article 20 paragraph 3 of the Teachers' Card does not apply.