I PKN 431/98
AI generated
Employee dismissed by mutual agreement cannot claim protection if her consent was not flawed.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the employee's cassation appeal against a labor court ruling that terminated her employment by mutual agreement. The court found that the employee knowingly agreed to the termination despite her pregnancy, as she failed to object to factual findings regarding her understanding of social security benefits. Consequently, the court held that the statutory protections for pregnant employees could not apply because the employee's will was not defective.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 177 § 3 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 84 § 1 Kodeksu cywilnego: An employee cannot successfully invoke protection for pregnant workers if her consent to a mutual termination agreement was not impaired by a defect.
Keywords
AI generated
mutual termination agreement
defective consent
pregnant employee protection
labor law cassation
social security benefits
employee knowledge
labor dispute outcome
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 177 § 3 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 84 § 1 Kodeksu cywilnego
Art. 39311 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 3933 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 39312 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego