I PZ 37/98
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on clerical error in copy and inadmissibility due to low claim value.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal regarding a lower court's decision to reject a claim based on its value. The appellant argued that a clerical error in the judgment copy and a procedural flaw in the judge's signature rendered the decision invalid. The court ruled that the error was merely a typographical mistake in the copy, not the original, and that the appeal was inadmissible due to the claim's value falling below the statutory threshold.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 350 KPC; Art. 393 pkt 1 KPC: A clerical error in a copy of a judgment does not require formal correction under Art. 350 KPC if the original is correct, and appeals in civil matters are inadmissible if the claim value is below the statutory limit.
Keywords
AI generated
clerical error in copy
inadmissibility of appeal
value threshold limit
typographical mistake
procedural defect
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 350 KPC
Art. 330 § 1 KPC
Art. 361 KPC
Art. 379 pkt 4 KPC
Art. 358 KPC
Art. 360 KPC
Art. 393 pkt 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 pkt 1 KPC