Supreme Court dismisses extraordinary review, ruling building compliance depends on construction permits, not resident registration.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review against the City Council's decision to terminate the perpetual use agreement. The appellants argued that their permanent registration in a commercial pavilion on the land satisfied the residential building requirements. The court held that determining whether a structure meets residential standards is the exclusive domain of the construction supervision authority, not the registration of residents.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 54 of the Construction Law; Art. 2 ust. 3 of the Act on Ownership of Apartments; Art. 3 ust. 1 pkt 1 of the Act on Renting of Apartments and Housing Supplements: Whether a building complies with residential conditions is determined by the competent construction supervision authority, not by the fact of permanent registration of persons in it.