Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 247/98 AI generated

Cassation dismissed as inadmissible because the second-instance court failed to rule on the plaintiff's full claim without a request for supplementation.

Case Number II UKN 247/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court rejected the cassation appeal filed by Andrzej K. against a partial judgment in an employment accident compensation case. The lower court altered the first-instance ruling but omitted a decision on the plaintiff's remaining claim for increased disability compensation, which neither party requested to be supplemented. The court held that since no party asked for the judgment to be completed within the statutory period, the cassation targeted a non-existent ruling and was therefore inadmissible under the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 351, art. 3938 KPC: If a court of the second instance fails to rule on the entirety of a party's claim without a request for supplementation, a cassation appeal against such a partial judgment is inadmissible as it targets a non-existent ruling.

Keywords

AI generated
inadmissible cassation partial judgment supplementation request non-existent ruling Civil Procedure Code employment accident disability compensation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 351 KPC
art. 3938 KPC

Cited Case Law

AI generated
C 1040/52
4 CR 1188/56
I PR 10/63
I PR 75/71
II URN 144/82
II CKN 15/97
I CZ 76/97
I CKU 51/97
III CZ 43/98
II URN 136/82
III PZP 14/72
uchwała z dnia 30 kwietnia 1966 r., III PZP 15/66

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text