Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 375/98 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses cassation where Art. 477 KPC does not apply to employer identity uncertainty cases.

Case Number I PKN 375/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Mirosław T. against a labor court judgment regarding unpaid wages. The defendant argued that the plaintiff was not an employee of the Polish firm but of a German entity, citing procedural defects and lack of evidence. The court held that Article 477 of the Civil Procedure Code does not apply when there is uncertainty about the employer's identity, and the lower court properly addressed the case's substance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 477 § 1 KPC; Art. 378 § 2 KPC; Art. 379 § 5 KPC; Art. 393 § 11 KPC; Art. 393 § 12 KPC: The provision regarding employer identity uncertainty does not apply to cases where the employer is unclear, and procedural defects do not constitute a violation of the right to defense if they merely involve evidentiary difficulties.

Keywords

AI generated
employer identity uncertainty labor dispute cassation civil procedure code right to defense evidentiary difficulties cross-border employment procedural invalidity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 477 § 1 KPC
Art. 378 § 2 KPC
Art. 379 § 5 KPC
Art. 393 § 11 KPC
Art. 393 § 12 KPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text