Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III KKO 2/98 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses request to resolve competence dispute between tax inspector and administrative court. No jurisdictional conflict exists under KPA Art. 190/192.

Case Number III KKO 2/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the request to resolve a competence dispute between the General Tax Inspector and the Administrative Court. The taxpayer argued that both organs incorrectly claimed jurisdiction over a tax audit verification, citing a prior decision where both rejected the case. The court ruled that no jurisdictional conflict exists because the administrative court rejected the complaint based on procedural exhaustion requirements, not on lack of jurisdiction.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 190 ust. 1 KPA; Art. 192 ust. 1 pkt 2 KPA: A dispute over jurisdiction under these provisions does not arise between a public administration body and the Supreme Administrative Court when the court rejects a complaint for procedural reasons rather than lack of jurisdiction.

Keywords

AI generated
competence dispute jurisdictional conflict administrative court tax inspection procedural exhaustion Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego administrative review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 190 § 1 KPA
art. 192 § 1 pkt 2 KPA
art. 16 ust. 1 pkt 4 ustawy o Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym
art. 34 ust. 1 ustawy o NSA
art. 199 § 1 pkt 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Wyniku kontroli z dnia 26 września 1996 r.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text