Supreme Court dismissed appeal, ruling family rent exceeds alimentary duty and no further damages warranted.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the widow and daughter against a lower court's award of damages and pension. The plaintiffs argued that the awarded compensation was insufficient to rebuild their home and cover living expenses after their husband's work-related death. The court held that the family rent already granted exceeded the deceased's statutory alimentary obligation and that the plaintiffs' financial situation had not significantly worsened beyond what the existing benefits covered.