II UKN 182/98
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed cassation, ruling that ex officio evidence is only allowed in exceptional cases requiring objective justification.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Stanisław T. against a lower court's decision in a disability pension dispute. The appellant argued that the appellate court erred by failing to conduct further psychiatric examinations despite his hospitalization and family history. The court held that the appellate court correctly relied on existing medical opinions which definitively excluded the alleged psychiatric condition, making additional evidence unnecessary.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 232 KPC; Art. 290 § 1 KPC: The court's ex officio conduct of evidence not indicated by a party is permissible only in exceptional procedural situations and must stem from an objective assessment of the necessity for its conduct.
Keywords
AI generated
ex officio evidence
disability pension
cassation appeal
medical opinion
procedural exception
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 232 KPC
Art. 290 § 1 KPC
Art. 278 KPC
Art. 393 § 12 KPC