Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 147/98 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; receiving two pensions despite warnings constitutes voluntary misrepresentation requiring repayment.

Case Number II UKN 147/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Teresa W. against a Social Insurance Fund decision ordering the return of family pensions. The applicant had received two concurrent family pensions from different agencies while failing to disclose the second source, despite being explicitly warned of the obligation to inform the paying authority. The court ruled that this concealment constituted voluntary misrepresentation, triggering the statutory requirement to repay the overpaid benefits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 106 ust. 2 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin; Art. 393 12 KPC; A person who receives two pensions while concealing the second source, despite warnings, must return the benefits as voluntarily misrepresentation.

Keywords

AI generated
family pension concurrent benefits voluntary misrepresentation social insurance fund repayment of benefits cassation appeal duty to inform

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 106 ust. 2 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin
Art. 393 12 KPC
Art. 393 4 KPC
Art. 393 11 KPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text