I PKN 239/98
AI generated
Teacher cannot use higher-paid safety technician hours to fill lower teaching workload quota.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the teacher's cassation appeal seeking to establish a half-time employment status based on combined teaching and safety technician duties. The lower courts found that witness testimony could not determine the specific weekly hours spent on safety tasks, making it impossible to calculate a total workload exceeding half-time. The court ruled that hours from a higher-paid, non-teaching position cannot be used to supplement a teacher's statutory teaching quota, and the plaintiff failed to prove the actual time spent on safety duties.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 128, 136 Kodeksu Pracy; A teacher's employment hours cannot be supplemented by hours worked on a different, higher-paid position to meet the statutory teaching workload quota.
Keywords
AI generated
teacher employment status
workload calculation
part-time employment
mixed job duties
time tracking evidence
safety technician role
cassation dismissal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 128 Kodeksu Pracy
art. 136 Kodeksu Pracy
art. 393 ust. 11 KPC
art. 393 ust. 12 KPC