Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 94/98 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed cassation on labor law dismissal, ruling procedural evidence rules do not override material findings of intoxication.

Case Number I PKN 94/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Stanisław M. against his dismissal from the Cooperative of Disabled Persons. The lower courts found the employee intoxicated at work based on witness testimony and documents, rejecting his claim of a gallbladder attack. The Court held that the lack of a blood test did not violate procedural rights because the employee waived further evidence requests and the dismissal was based on established facts of intoxication.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 246, 247 KPC; Art. 74 § 1, 75 § 4 KC; Art. 299 KPC; Art. 393 § 1, 3 KPC; Art. 52 § 1 pkt 1 KP: The absence of a blood test does not constitute a violation of the right to defense if the employee waived additional evidence requests, and a finding of intoxication based on witness testimony suffices for dismissal under labor law.

Keywords

AI generated
labor law dismissal intoxication at work right to defense procedural evidence rules cassation appeal dismissal witness testimony validity waiver of evidence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 246 KPC
Art. 247 KPC
Art. 74 § 1 KC
Art. 75 § 4 KC
Art. 299 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 3 KPC
Art. 52 § 1 pkt 1 KP

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text