I PKN 214/98
AI generated
Misappropriation of cash without consent constitutes a serious breach of duties regardless of repayment or others' actions.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal in a dispute over the reinstatement of an employee who repeatedly withdrew cash from the store register without employer consent. Although the employee repaid the funds and other staff had similar practices, the court found these factors irrelevant to the severity of the breach. The decision rested on the conclusion that such unauthorized withdrawals constitute a serious violation of employment duties under Article 52 of the Labor Code.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 52 § 1 pkt 1 KP; Art. 393 § 12 KPC: Misappropriation of funds without employer consent constitutes a serious breach of duties regardless of subsequent repayment or similar conduct by other employees.
Keywords
AI generated
serious breach of duties
misappropriation of funds
labor code termination
reinstatement claim
cash register abuse
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 52 § 1 pkt 1 KP
Art. 264 § 2 KP
Art. 265 § 1 KP
Art. 30 § 5 KP
Art. 393 § 12 KPC
Art. 56 KP