Supreme Court dismissed cassation, ruling no negative procedural prerequisite exists for reinstatement claims while termination proceedings continue.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the employer against a lower court's decision to reinstate the employee. The employee had initially sought to declare a termination ineffective but later changed her request to demand reinstatement under Article 42 of the Labor Code. The Court held that the mere fact that a separate proceeding regarding the termination's invalidity was ongoing did not constitute a negative procedural prerequisite for the reinstatement claim. Consequently, the lower court correctly applied the law to order reinstatement despite the concurrent proceedings.