Supreme Court dismissed cassation as the claim was not part of the original dispute and facts excluded overtime pay.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a former employee against a lower court ruling denying overtime pay. The employee argued that the law entitled him to separate overtime compensation for his independent supervisory role, but the courts found he worked in a position where he controlled his own schedule and did not require separate overtime pay. The court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible because the claim for specific overtime compensation was not part of the original dispute between the parties.