Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III AO 24/98 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal for retrial due to lack of statutory grounds and failure to notify court of new counsel.

Case Number III AO 24/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court rejected the appellant's request for a retrial, ruling that the statutory grounds for such a remedy were not met. The appellant argued that the court failed to notify them of the hearing because their new lawyer had not been properly registered, despite the previous lawyer's mandate covering the Supreme Court proceedings. The court determined that the original lawyer's mandate remained valid and that the appellant failed to prove the new lawyer's registration according to procedural requirements.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 401 pkt 2 KPC; art. 94 § 1 KPC: An appeal for retrial is inadmissible if the party was not properly represented, as the court was notified of the lawyer whose mandate the party had revoked without informing the court.

Keywords

AI generated
appeal for retrial representation mandate court notification procedural rights Supreme Court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 401 pkt 2 KPC
art. 94 § 1 KPC
art. 89 § 1 KPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text