Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 94/98 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal on social security pension due to insufficient evidence of employment period.

Case Number II UKN 94/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding a social security pension dispute, while rejecting the defendant's appeal due to the low value of the contested amount. The court found that the appellate court failed to properly evaluate witness testimony regarding the plaintiff's employment start date, which was crucial for establishing the required service period under the Teacher's Card Act. Consequently, the Supreme Court ruled that the case must be remanded to the appellate court for a new factual assessment and legal application.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 393 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 8 KPC: A cassation appeal against a decision in a social security pension case is inadmissible if the value of the subject matter is below the statutory threshold, and the court must remand the case for retrial if the lower court failed to adequately evaluate evidence regarding the duration of employment.

Keywords

AI generated
social security pension employment period evidence cassation inadmissibility value threshold KPC Teacher's Card Act remand for retrial witness testimony evaluation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 393 § 1 KPC
art. 393 § 8 KPC
art. 394 § 4 KPC
art. 217 § 2 KPC
art. 232 KPC
art. 233 § 1 KPC
art. 328 § 1 KPC
art. 27 ust. 1 Karta Nauczyciela
art. 88 Karta Nauczyciela
art. 5 pkt 3 ustawy rewaloryzacyjnej

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text