Minor child injured helping parents in farm work entitled to one-time compensation despite parental negligence.

The Supreme Court reversed the appellate court's dismissal, ruling that an eight-year-old child is eligible for one-time compensation after being injured while assisting parents in agricultural work. The lower court denied the claim based on the child's age and the parents' alleged gross negligence, arguing the child lacked the capacity for fault. The Supreme Court held that the statutory definition of 'nearest relative' includes minor children and that the prohibition on child labor does not negate the accident's status or exempt the parents from liability.