Supreme Court dismissed teacher's appeal, ruling non-medical breaks exceeding three months break continuous service for automatic appointment.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a lower court's rejection of her request for a written confirmation of automatic teacher appointment. The plaintiff argued that her 12 years of teaching experience, including breaks, qualified her under the Teacher's Charter, while the opposing school contended that breaks unrelated to illness or specific leave interrupted the required continuous service. The court ruled that only breaks due to illness or non-vacation leave lasting no more than three months count toward continuous service, and longer breaks extend the required period, thereby denying the plaintiff's automatic appointment status. Consequently, the court held that the plaintiff failed to meet the statutory requirements for appointment without a specific license.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 10 ust. 2 pkt 7 Karty Nauczyciela; The period of continuous work for automatic appointment includes only breaks due to illness or non-vacation leave not exceeding three months, with longer breaks extending the required service period.