Supreme Court dismissed cassation against labor court ruling reinstating employee and awarding severance pay.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the employer against the lower court's decision to reinstate the employee and award severance pay. The employer argued procedural errors and the failure to consider sick pay entitlements, while the employee contended she was unaware of her pregnancy at the time of dismissal. The court rejected these claims, ruling that the employer's written notice limited the scope of the dispute to the stated reasons and that the lower court correctly applied the law regarding severance during pregnancy.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC; Art. 392 § 1 KPC; Art. 57 § 2 KP; Art. 30 § 4 KP; Art. 52 KP; Art. 48 pkt 2 ustawy o świadczeniach pieniężnych; The employer's written notice of dismissal without notice limits the scope of the dispute to the stated reasons, and the lower court's findings on the amount of severance pay are not subject to review in cassation proceedings.