Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 149/98 AI generated

Labor law: Art. 12 of the Special Rules Act does not apply to lawyer dismissal due to organizational changes.

Case Number I PKN 149/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a lawyer seeking reinstatement after his contract was terminated due to the company's organizational and economic changes. The lower court found the dismissal substantively justified by the need to reduce costs by outsourcing legal services to a civil law firm, despite procedural flaws in union consultation. The Supreme Court rejected the appeal because the cassation arguments incorrectly targeted the first instance court's evidence evaluation rather than the second instance court's handling of the union complaints.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 12 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 28 grudnia 1989 r. o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn dotyczących zakładu pracy; Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.; The provision regarding organizational changes does not apply to the dismissal of a lawyer when the position is eliminated and legal services are outsourced to a civil law firm due to economic reasons.

Keywords

AI generated
labor law dismissal organizational changes lawyer employment union consultation cassation appeal evidence evaluation economic reasons

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 12 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 28 grudnia 1989 r. o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn dotyczących zakładu pracy
Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 4 k.p.c.
Art. 387 k.p.c.
Art. 388 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I CKN 97/96 OSNC 1997 z. 6-7, poz. 87

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text