II UKN 60/98
AI generated
Polish Supreme Court dismisses appeal for failure to specify procedural law violation affecting case outcome.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Polish Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Rudolf G. against a lower court's decision regarding the start date of his disability pension. The appellant argued that the courts incorrectly ignored his 1977 disability status, but the Supreme Court ruled that the appeal failed to concretely specify which procedural law was violated and how that violation impacted the result. Consequently, the court determined it could not review the factual findings and had to reject the claim for a new trial.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 393 § 1, 3, 12, 15 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego; A cassation appeal alleging a violation of substantive law must be dismissed if it does not concretely specify the violated provision and its impact on the outcome.
Keywords
AI generated
cassation appeal dismissal
procedural law violation
concrete specification requirement
Supreme Court review limits
disability pension date
substantive law inaction
factual findings binding
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 393 § 1 KPC
art. 393 § 3 KPC
art. 393 § 12 KPC
art. 393 § 15 KPC
art. 18 of the Act of 12 June 1975 on benefits in the event of work accidents and occupational diseases