Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 60/98 AI generated

Polish Supreme Court dismisses appeal for failure to specify procedural law violation affecting case outcome.

Case Number II UKN 60/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Polish Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Rudolf G. against a lower court's decision regarding the start date of his disability pension. The appellant argued that the courts incorrectly ignored his 1977 disability status, but the Supreme Court ruled that the appeal failed to concretely specify which procedural law was violated and how that violation impacted the result. Consequently, the court determined it could not review the factual findings and had to reject the claim for a new trial.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 393 § 1, 3, 12, 15 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego; A cassation appeal alleging a violation of substantive law must be dismissed if it does not concretely specify the violated provision and its impact on the outcome.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal dismissal procedural law violation concrete specification requirement Supreme Court review limits disability pension date substantive law inaction factual findings binding

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 393 § 1 KPC
art. 393 § 3 KPC
art. 393 § 12 KPC
art. 393 § 15 KPC
art. 18 of the Act of 12 June 1975 on benefits in the event of work accidents and occupational diseases

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text