II UKN 51/98
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for supplementary one-time work accident compensation as inadmissible new claim.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal regarding a claim for supplementary one-time compensation for a 1967 work accident. The appellant argued for increased compensation based on new medical findings, but the court found the claim was procedurally barred. The court determined that the appellant had previously obtained a compensatory pension and thus the current request constituted a new claim inadmissible in appellate proceedings.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 383 KPC; Art. 393 KPC: A request for supplementary one-time compensation constitutes a new claim and is inadmissible in cassation proceedings if the appellant previously obtained a compensatory pension.
Keywords
AI generated
cassation appeal
new claim
inadmissible
work accident
supplementary compensation
procedural bar
appellate proceedings
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 383 KPC
Art. 393 KPC
Art. 444 § 2 KC
Art. 300 KP
art. 9 ust. 1 of the Act on Work Accident Benefits
art. 32 of the Act on Work Accident Benefits