Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 143/98 AI generated

Overtime work during employer control without actual labor does not qualify for overtime pay under Labor Code.

Case Number I PKN 143/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court partially overturned the lower court's ruling, quashing the award of 7,666.16 PLN for alleged overtime hours. The court found that while the driver remained under the employer's control, he did not actually perform work during those specific periods. Consequently, the time spent waiting or resting could not be classified as overtime work requiring additional pay. The case was remanded to the appellate court for a new factual determination of actual work hours.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 133 § 1 KP; Art. 134 KP: Time spent under employer control without actual performance of work does not constitute overtime work and is not entitled to overtime remuneration.

Keywords

AI generated
overtime remuneration employer control actual work performance labor code provisions remittance of judgment driver duties overtime calculation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 133 § 1 KP
Art. 134 KP
Art. 128 KP
Art. 85 KP
Art. 100 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 2 KPC
Art. 463 § 2 KPC

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PR 83/75

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text