Polish Supreme Court dismissed appeal, ruling poor practical teaching skills justified dismissal despite procedural flaws.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Poland dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a labor dispute judgment. The lower court had reinstated the plaintiff, an industrial training instructor, after finding the employer's evaluation of his work was procedurally flawed and unobjective. The Supreme Court reversed this, holding that the employer's assessment was valid because it was conducted by competent personnel and the plaintiff's low score on practical skills objectively justified the termination of his employment contract.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 45 § 1 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 393 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego: A dismissal based on a poor performance evaluation is valid if the assessment was conducted by competent persons and the low score objectively reflects the employee's lack of necessary skills, even if procedural irregularities occurred.