Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 106/98 AI generated

Supreme Court allows damages instead of reinstatement for union worker fired for drunkenness after employer violated union protection rules.

Case Number I PKN 106/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of the union worker's claim for reinstatement due to procedural violations by the employer. The worker, a union official, was fired for refusing sobriety tests and returning to work while intoxicated, but the employer failed to obtain necessary union committee consent before termination. The court ruled that while the worker's conduct justified dismissal, the employer's breach of union protection statutes prevented a total denial of the claim, mandating damages instead.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 8 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych: Where an employer violates statutory union protection procedures regarding the dismissal of a union official, the employee may claim damages under Art. 56 KP rather than reinstatement, as the employer's procedural breach negates the grounds for total dismissal.

Keywords

AI generated
union official dismissal drunkenness at work reinstatement damages union protection statutes procedural violation labor law appeal employee rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 8 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy z 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
Art. 477 1 § 2 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 56 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 393 13 § 1 zdanie pierwsze Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PZP 19/96

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text