Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III RN 23/98 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed extraordinary review for non-derogatory legal error regarding housing compensation eligibility criteria.

Case Number III RN 23/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed against the Minister's decision denying housing compensation to Mr. K. The lower court had ruled that Mr. K. qualified for compensation based on the date of his expenditures rather than the law's effective date, while the review argued he should have met all conditions by the effective date. The court held that a legal error only warrants extraordinary review if it directly undermines the principle of legality, which was not proven here.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 57 ust. 2 ustawy o Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym; Art. 236 ust. 2 Konstytucji RP: A legal error justifying extraordinary review must directly endanger the principle of legality, not merely represent a divergent interpretation of statutory conditions.

Keywords

AI generated
extraordinary review principle of legality housing compensation legal error threshold administrative law statutory interpretation derogatory error

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 57 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 11 maja 1995 r. o Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym
Art. 236 ust. 2 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 2 kwietnia 1997 r.
Art. 10 ustawy z dnia 1 marca 1996 r. o zmianie Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
art. 236 ust. 2 Konstytucji

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text