Supreme Court dismissed appeal on employment relationship; work assigned by one employer to another does not create new employment. Appeal rejected due to lack of evidence for dual full-time employment.

The Supreme Court partially dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding an alleged employment relationship between 1994 and 1995. The lower court found the plaintiff worked for the defendant company but performed duties assigned by a third party, not creating a new employment link. The court rejected the claim of dual full-time employment as logically impossible given the evidence, thus upholding the dismissal of the main claims while awarding costs.