I PKN 60/98
AI generated
Employer salary increase offer constitutes a change of employment contract terms accepted by tacit agreement.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the employee's cassation appeal regarding her employment status and salary. The lower courts found that the employer's written offer for a salary increase constituted a change to the employment contract terms, which the employee accepted tacitly by returning to work. The court rejected the argument that such a change required a formal notice of termination or that filing a lawsuit implied rejection of the new offer.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 29 § 3 KP; Art. 52 § 1 pkt 1 KP: An employer's offer to increase salary constitutes a change of employment contract terms accepted by tacit agreement, not a notice of termination, and filing a lawsuit does not imply rejection of the new offer.
Keywords
AI generated
employment contract modification
tacit acceptance of terms
salary increase offer
change of job conditions
labor law procedure
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 29 § 3 KP
Art. 52 § 1 pkt 1 KP
Art. 393 § 12 KPC
Cited Case Law
AI generatedI PRN 51/76
I PZP 5/78
I PRN 117/79
I PRN 103/83