Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 570/97 AI generated

Mining pension right granted based on actual duties performed, not job title or contract text.

Case Number II UKN 570/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the pension fund's cassation appeal, upholding the lower court's award of a mining pension to the applicant. The applicant had worked as an underground mining instructor, though his official job title was that of a field training manager. The court ruled that the decisive factor for qualifying as mining work is the actual duties performed, not the formal job description or contract terms. Consequently, the applicant's 27 years of underground work satisfied the statutory requirements for the pension.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 5 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 1 lutego 1983 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym górników i ich rodzin; Art. 9 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 1 lutego 1983 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym górników i ich rodzin: The determination of whether work qualifies as mining work for pension purposes depends on the actual duties performed by the employee, not the content of the employment contract or the official job title.

Keywords

AI generated
mining pension eligibility actual duties performed employment contract interpretation underground mining work pension qualification criteria

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 5 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 1 lutego 1983 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym górników i ich rodzin
Art. 9 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 1 lutego 1983 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym górników i ich rodzin
Art. 393 12 KPC
Art. 393 15 KPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text