Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III SZ 8/97 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal claiming defense rights violation despite vague legal qualification of pharmacist's offense.

Case Number III SZ 8/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the pharmacist's appeal against her conviction for professional misconduct, upholding the lower court's sentence. Although the legal qualification of the offense was not fully specified, the court found the defense rights were not violated because the defendant admitted to the factual elements and had full knowledge of the charges. The court ruled that the lack of specific legal citations did not impair the defense since the defendant did not contest the facts or submit evidence to verify them.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 46 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy o izbach aptekarskich; Art. 32 rozporządzenia Ministra Zdrowia i Opieki Społecznej: The right to defense is not violated by vague legal qualification if the defendant admits the factual elements and possesses the means to defend themselves.

Keywords

AI generated
professional misconduct pharmacist liability right to defense vague legal qualification admission of facts Supreme Court appeal administrative penalty

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 46 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 19 kwietnia 1991 r. o izbach aptekarskich
art. 46 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 19 kwietnia 1991 r. o izbach aptekarskich
art. 399 KPK
art. 405 KPK
§ 32 rozporządzenia Ministra Zdrowia i Opieki Społecznej z dnia 30 maja 1993 r.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text