Supreme Court dismisses appeal; collective dismissal law does not require job reduction for individual termination due to reorganization.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding the invalidity of his individual employment termination. The court found that while a reduction in workforce is a prerequisite for collective dismissals under the specific act, it is not a condition for individual dismissals justified by organizational changes under the general Labor Code. Consequently, the lower court's reliance on the reduction requirement was legally erroneous, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 45 § 1 Kodeksu pracy; ustawa z dnia 28 grudnia 1989 r. o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn dotyczących zakładu pracy; Art. 10 ust. 1; Art. 10 ust. 3; Art. 8; Art. 393 § 1 KPC; The requirement of reduced employment is a condition for collective dismissals and the right to severance pay but not for individual dismissals justified by organizational changes.