II UKN 263/97
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal and remands case due to conflicting prior judgments on the same claim.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Poland quashed the appealed judgment and remanded the case for retrial due to conflicting prior rulings on the same claim. The dispute involved a worker seeking sick pay while the Social Insurance Institution argued he was excluded from coverage. The court found that lower courts had issued contradictory decisions regarding the worker's employment status and insurance obligations without resolving these inconsistencies.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 379 pkt 3 KPC; Art. 393 KPC: When conflicting judgments exist on the same claim between the same parties, the appealed decision must be quashed and the case remanded for retrial to ensure legal certainty.
Keywords
AI generated
res judicata
conflicting judgments
remand for retrial
social insurance benefits
employment status
legal certainty
supreme court review
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 379 pkt 3 KPC
Art. 393 KPC
Art. 5 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1974 r. o świadczeniach pieniężnych z ubezpieczenia społecznego w razie choroby i macierzyństwa
Cited Case Law
AI generatedSąd Wojewódzki-Sąd Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w Kielcach z dnia 5 czerwca 1996 r.
Sąd Apelacyjny z dnia 13 grudnia 1995 r.
Sąd Wojewódzki-Sąd Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w Kielcach z dnia 28 czerwca 1995 r.