Supreme Court dismisses appeal for adding new cassation grounds after the one-month deadline has passed.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal to supplement cassation grounds submitted after the statutory one-month deadline expired. The appellant argued that the missing continuation of the cassation document was a formal defect correctable under Article 130 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court ruled that while a missing signature is a correctable formal defect, the absence of the document's continuation is not, and adding new grounds after the deadline constitutes an impermissible circumvention of time limits.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 393 3 KPC; Art. 393 4 KPC: The failure to cite cassation grounds and their justification constitutes a substantive defect that cannot be cured under Art. 130 KPC, and submitting new grounds after the deadline is inadmissible as it circumvents statutory time limits.