Supreme Court quashes appeal ruling for new expert opinion on occupational lung disease existence.

The Supreme Court quashed the appellate court's dismissal of the plaintiff's claim for compensation regarding occupational lung disease. The plaintiff argued that the initial expert opinion was insufficient and requested a new expert to assess the disease's impact on the circulatory system, which the lower court incorrectly dismissed as a mere delay tactic. The court held that the plaintiff's request for a multidisciplinary expert opinion was substantiated by medical necessity and did not violate procedural rules against dilatory tactics.